News

Mercedes-Benz Drivers Secure Class Certification in Airbag MDL

Posted on March 04, 2025

A Florida federal court has granted class certification to Mercedes-Benz drivers in the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) concerning defective airbags, marking a significant victory for vehicle owners. The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Federico Moreno, allows affected vehicle owners to pursue their claims collectively, strengthening their ability to hold the automaker accountable.

Lead counsel Peter Prieto, a partner with Podhurst Orseck, played a critical role and offered commentary via a Law360 article that his team is pleased with the ruling and that Judge Moreno’s decision is consistent with Eleventh Circuit law.

The Case Against Mercedes-Benz

The litigation centers around allegations that certain Mercedes-Benz vehicles were equipped with defective airbags that pose serious safety risks to drivers and passengers. Plaintiffs argue that the automaker failed to disclose these defects, exposing consumers to potential harm. Judge Moreno’s ruling recognizes the uniform nature of the claims, affirming that class treatment is appropriate for resolving these allegations efficiently.

Broader Implications in Airbag Litigation

The Mercedes-Benz airbag litigation follows a broader pattern of legal action against automakers over defective airbags. In June 2023, Podhurst Orseck also secured class certification for a group of approximately six million Fiat Chrysler owners in a similar MDL involving Takata airbags.

What’s Next?

With class certification granted, the litigation against Mercedes-Benz will move forward. This ruling provides a pathway toward compensation and accountability for affected vehicle owners.

Podhurst Orseck has been at the forefront of high-stakes litigation against major manufacturers, particularly class actions and mass torts involving automotive defects, advocating for consumer rights and full financial recovery. The firm’s track record in automotive defect litigation underscores its commitment to achieving meaningful outcomes for plaintiffs.

Stay tuned for further updates on this case and other major consumer protection and mass tort litigation developments.